By Therese Rando, Ph.D.

Whenever a family member dies, there is a process that a healthy
family undergoes in response to the loss of one of its own. This
process is called “role reorganization.” It occurs because the
family needs to get itself back into the rhythm and balance that
was lost when the family member died. Many times families are not
even consciously aware of what they are doing, but it is a
critically important process nonetheless.
The family is a system in which the sum (the family) is more than
the total of its parts (the family members). This means that the
family is more than merely a collection of its individual people.
It is above and beyond this. The family system is something which
takes on its own life and its own characteristics and does not just
reflect the individuals within it.
There are two important principles in family systems. The first
principle is that anything that affects your family will affect its
individual members, and anything that affects the individual
members will affect the family. If a family is distressed because
one of its members is seriously ill, this will affect all of its
members. For instance, the father may be preoccupied when he tries
to function normally at work. Conversely, if work problems are
distressing the father, it will affect the family, because he will
be acting differently due to his concerns over problems at
work.
The second principle concerns balance. Like any other system, your
family works to maintain itself on an even keel; it struggles to
maintain its equilibrium. To keep the family functioning on track,
each family develops specific roles for each person and establishes
rules, communication patterns, family expectations, and patterns of
behavior which keep the family operating in a consistent and stable
fashion. They are determined by that particular family’s beliefs,
values, ways of coping, and relationships within the family.
The methods of keeping a family operating as smoothly as possible
differ from family to family. What might work for your family may
be totally wrong for another. Each family has its own unique and
characteristic style. Having set ways of doing things does not mean
that the family is without problems. It merely means that the
family and its problems most probably will continue to operate in
the same old ways unless something forces them to change.
Like systems, families require the ongoing support of each
individual component (family member) to keep the system operating
in balance. When an element is added or taken away, the system
becomes unbalanced and there is a struggle to reach balance again.
Therefore, whenever anything changes in the usual and customary
ways in which a particular family operates, whether because of
problems inside the family (for example, the death of a member) or
outside of it (for example, external stress put on the family), the
family must know how to compensate for these changes. It is similar
to a balance scale, where if something is added to one side it
alters the other side by the same amount in the opposite direction.
If the scale is ever to become balanced again, something must be
added to one side or subtracted from the other. When the family
experiences some type or degree of change, it, too, must adjust
itself to accommodate to that change and get back into
equilibrium.
What does all of this information on family dynamics have to do
with grief? Very simply, it helps us to understand what
happens—indeed, what must happen—in families after somebody dies.
When a member of your family dies and no longer can fulfill his
assigned roles or obligations, there is a shift in the balance of
your family. One element has been removed and the entire family
system is thrown into disequilibrium; something has to change. Your
family focuses on reestablishing balance in the system. This will
affect not only the family as a whole and its individual members,
but also the various relationships that exist within the family.
Power, responsibilities and roles will be reassigned as a result of
the family’s struggle to reestablish stability in the face of your
loved one’s death Your family’s unique ways of functioning
determine how it will respond to the demands for change.
Some of the reassigned roles and responsibilities are easy to see.
Everyone in your family has a number of obvious roles to play to
help the family run smoothly. For example, if the one who died is
the one who cooked all the meals, then someone else will have to be
reassigned that chore. Or, if the one who died is the one who
always took out the garbage, someone is going to have to assume
that responsibility or else the house will become a dump This is
what is known as “role reorganization” —roles are reorganized and
reassigned to different people in order that essential family
functions can be carried on to ensure that the family continues to
operate.
Some roles and responsibilities arc not so clearly apparent. They
may or may not be explicitly assigned, but all family members know
that they exist. This is seen, for example, in the case of the
family “troublemaker.’ This is the person who constantly gets into
trouble. Everyone pays attention to him instead of looking at the
more upsetting problems in the family. Very often a child will take
on this role and serve the purpose of taking attention away from
one or both of the parents’ problems. If this child dies, someone
else in the family will have to cause trouble if the family wants
to keep the focus off the real issues. If this does not happen, and
if the customary methods of keeping things running in the same old
way do not work, the family is thrown way out of balance and
suffers severe problems. This does not happen only where there is a
negative role such as ‘troublemaker” to be reassigned. It happens
as well when there are positive roles left unfulfilled by a family
member’s death.
After your family member dies, the degree of role reorganization
that will be necessary depends on the number and types of roles
that particular family member fulfilled. For example in traditional
families, if the person who dies is the father, chances are that
there are a large number of roles to reassign if the family is to
function. Among others, these could include the roles of provider,
protector, maintenance man, and the numerous roles inherent in
being a husband and a father. Additionally, each role has its own
nature, meaning, and role-fulfilling aspects that will be different
to individual family members. This means that what one child needs
to fill in for her father will be different from what another child
needs. The family needs someone to assume the father’s functional
roles, but the individual family members will need more than that
depending upon the nature of the personal relationships severed by
the death. In contrast, if an infant dies, there will be fewer
roles to reassign in order for the family to function. However,
don’t look solely at mere number of roles. The role of being the
infant and embodying parental hopes and expectations, and of being
the object of love and focus of family attention, is a critical
one, and its absence can strike at the heart of a family, even
though the family is more affected behaviorally by the death of the
father.
Suffice it to say that in each family the deceased’s roles will
need to be fulfilled in some way, or the family will be thrown out
of kilter. Sometimes this ends up being a positive thing, because
the family may go for help and/or find new ways of functioning that
are better than before. Yet, many times problems just continue
unabated. In either case, whether it is or isn’t resolved healthily
or successfully, the period of reorganization prompted by a family
member’s death is most stressful for all concerned.
Lastly, you should be aware of the serious consequences of roles
that are not reassigned suitably to family members. If you give
someone a role that is inappropriate for them (for example, expect
a child to take on her deceased sister’s personality), inconsistent
with their preparation (for example, ask a little boy to be the
‘man” around the house), or incompatible with current roles (for
example, you expect the mother to be home with the children and at
work simultaneously), you are only asking for further problems. New
role assignments can constitute either secondary losses (for
example, the person is robbed of his identity) or secondary gains
(for example, the person finally gets some recognition that
formerly may have been withheld) for individual family members.
In role reorganization you must evaluate not only what roles need
to be reassigned but also whether the reassignment is as healthy as
possible for all involved. It will be important to keep in mind
that each bereaved family member has to cope both with the
complexities of the grief process itself and with an altered,
out-of-balance system and new role responsibilities and
demands.
Special Family System Issues in Grief A problem that can
complicate the family reorganization process stems from the
volatility of the grieving family and the need for compromise among
family members in their grief. Both issues arise because of the
very special nature of the family system.
The “multiplier effect” exists in all families. This is when the
grief of one member triggers the grief of another. Having so many
acutely grieving people under one roof is such an intense situation
that, at times, it is a wonder that the whole situation does not
blow up with the accumulation of grief and pain. In contrast, at
other times, the presence of a sense of community, shared loss, and
strength in numbers is quite comforting and supportive.
Family members must recognize the necessity to weigh the needs of a
particular family member versus the needs of the family as a whole.
A delicate balance must be struck. For instance, what should be
done when one member finds it too upsetting to look at the
photographs of the deceased that the rest of the family wants to
hang on the wall. How should the family respond when two out of the
six members find it too painful to put up the Christmas tree, but
the others need to put it up. Yet it is not right for family
members to hide their grief in an attempt to protect one another or
promote false unity. This will only fuel the volatility, increase
the chances for communication problems and unmet needs, and force
the grieving underground, adding to the potential for unresolved
grief.
There are no right or wrong answers in these situations; families
must learn to compromise. There is the best chance for success in
this if communication among your family members can be open and
honest, each person’s needs are recognized as being just as
legitimate and important as everyone else’s, and there is a
commitment to the survival of the family, with compromise valued
and assurance that in other situations one’s needs will take
precedence.
As with married couples who have lost a child, family members must
not expect each other to have the same needs, to grieve in similar
fashion along an identical course, or to assume that each has lost
the same relationship. They must allow for personal differences,
recognizing that the individual factors of each particular person’s
grief will influence that person’s reaction to the death more than
will her presumed similarity to other family members, or the fact
that they all have lost the same person. Lastly, family members
will need to understand that while their closeness may be
supportive in their grief, it also can make them likely to displace
blame, anger, and other hostile feelings onto one another, to avoid
communication for fear of upsetting the other, or to place
irrational demands on each other. As a family, and as individuals,
your family members will need to minimize this as much as possible,
be gentle and patient with one another, and have the proper
perspective on what grieving the death of your loved one will
mean.
After a family member dies, the surviving family must reorganize
itself to survive and must cope with the stresses of containing
different grievers, each with diverse, idiosyncratic needs. It is a
mammoth task.
Taken from Therese A. Rando, How To Go on Living When Someone
You Love Dies. New York: Bantam Books, 1991, pp. 121-125.
Related articles:
•
Do Men Grieve Differently from Women?
•
The Grief of Sibling Survivors
•
The Grieving Teen
•
Helping Children Through Grief
•
Helping a Grieving Parent
•
The Grief of Grandparents
•
How to Settle an Estate Peacefully
Also by Therese Rando:
•
The Purpose of Grief and Mourning
•
Sudden Death
•
Adult Loss of a Sibling
•
What 'Recovery' Will and Will Not Mean
Dr. Therese Rando, author of
How To Go On Living When Someone You Love Dies
, is a
psychologist in Warwick, Rhode Island, where she is the Clinical
Director of The Institute for the Study and Treatment of Loss.
Having published 70 works pertaining to the clinical aspects of
dying, death, loss, and trauma, Dr. Rando is a recognized expert in
the field and has appeared on numerous television programs,
including “Dateline,” CBS “This Morning,” “Today Show,” “Good
Morning, America,” and “The Oprah Winfrey Show.”
Image Source: magnetas/StockXchng
You need to be a member of LegacyConnect to add comments!
Join LegacyConnect